Categories
PURE BLOG

Why have Christians waged war against Muslims for centuries, and even today some Christians are extremely positive towards Jews while others don’t trust them at all? What leads to Jewish and Muslim conflict today?

Christians, Jews and Muslims share deep roots and long rivalry. The Israelite religion centred on the Temple in Jerusalem – completed c. 957 BCE and destroyed in 587/586 BCE. Christianity grew inside Judaism in the first century CE after Jesus’ life and death. Islam began in Arabia around 610 CE with Muhammad’s first revelations. (Encyclopaedia Britannica, 2025).

Religions formed identity and power. Early Christian leaders framed Jews as religious rivals and often blamed them for Jesus’ death. That set a pattern of exclusion and legal limits that fed anti-Jewish popular feeling in medieval Europe. Scholars link this to theological “replacement” ideas and to social conflict in weak states. (Langmuir, 1990).

Christian–Muslim war has both sacred and worldly causes. From the late eleventh century the Crusades mixed papal aims, noble ambition and trade with a call to liberate holy places. Crusading created cycles of violence across the eastern Mediterranean and fuelled mutual fear. (Asbridge, 2004).

Jews in Muslim lands often fared better than in Christian lands. Muslim rulers made Jews “dhimmis” – second-class but usually protected. That status gave room for study, trade and relative security until local politics or conquest brought trouble. (Cohen, 1994).

Modern patterns stem from nationalism and empire. Zionism, Ottoman decline, British rule and settler colonisation in Palestine after 1917 created a clash over land, rights and statehood. That struggle hardened into long war and acute distrust between many Jews and many Muslims today. (Khalidi, 2020).

Attitudes among Christians to Jews now split. The Holocaust and Vatican II prompted major Christian shifts. The 1965 declaration Nostra Aetate rejected collective guilt and urged dialogue. Some churches and Christians now pursue repair and strong ties with Jews. Others keep older suspicions or view Israel through politicised lenses – so views vary by theology, politics and local memory. (Vatican, 1965).

In short, old theology, social rivalries and state power made much early conflict. Modern war and mistrust flow more from colonialism, nationalism and competing claims to land and security. Religious difference still shapes feelings, but politics now drives the fiercest fights.

References

Asbridge, T. (2004). The First Crusade: A New History. Oxford University Press.

Cohen, M. R. (1994). Under Crescent and Cross: The Jews in the Middle Ages. Princeton University Press.

Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Temple of Jerusalem; Christianity; How was Islam founded? Retrieved 2025.

Khalidi, R. (2020). The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017. Metropolitan Books.

Langmuir, G. I. (1990). History, Religion, and Antisemitism. University of California Press.

Vatican. (1965). Nostra Aetate: Declaration on the Relation of the Church to Non-Christian Religions. Vatican.

Categories
PURE BLOG

Gender Bias in CPR Training May Reduce Women’s Chances of Survival, Research Warns

New research highlights a persistent gender gap in rates of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and survival after cardiac arrest, with women significantly less likely than men to receive lifesaving intervention.

A large-scale analysis from Duke University found that women were 14% less likely to receive bystander CPR or defibrillation compared with men, even after adjusting for neighbourhood and demographic factors (Blewer et al., 2024). This finding aligns with earlier work showing that in the United Kingdom, only 68% of women experiencing cardiac arrest received bystander CPR, compared with 73% of men (Blom et al., 2019).

Social and cultural discomfort about touching a woman’s chest is often cited as a key reason for hesitation among bystanders. Studies suggest that this reluctance is reinforced by a long-standing gender bias in CPR training. A 2024 analysis found that 95% of commercially available CPR manikins are flat-chested, with only one model including realistic breast features (Szabo et al., 2024). This lack of anatomical accuracy limits the realism of training scenarios and may foster unconscious bias during real emergencies.

The survival implications are substantial. A systematic review of international data confirmed that women have consistently lower out-of-hospital survival rates than men, although outcomes vary by region and setting (Lakbar et al., 2022). Experts argue that the omission of female anatomy from CPR training may play an indirect but important role in this disparity.

Evidence also points to a straightforward intervention. A study published in JEMS reported that when silicone breast adjuncts were attached to manikins, participants were almost twice as likely to report comfort performing CPR on women (Kim et al., 2023). Researchers conclude that breast-inclusive training tools could help normalise correct hand placement, improve bystander confidence, and ultimately save more women’s lives.

The growing body of evidence calls for urgent reform in CPR education, ensuring that all bodies are represented in training resources and public awareness campaigns. As Szabo et al. (2024) note, “CPR training is not only a clinical issue, but a gender and rights-based healthcare issue.”

References

  • Blewer, A. L., Starks, M. A., Malta-Hansen, C., et al. (2024). Sex differences in receipt of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation considering neighbourhood racial and ethnic composition. Journal of the American Heart Association, 13, e031113.
  • Blom, M. T., Oving, I., Berdowski, J., van Valkengoed, I. G. M., Bardai, A., & Tan, H. L. (2019). Women have lower chances than men to be resuscitated and survive out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. European Heart Journal, 40(47), 3824–3834. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz297
  • Lakbar, I., Ippolito, M., Nassiri, A., Delamarre, L., Tadger, P., Leone, M., & Einav, S. (2022). Sex and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival: a systematic review. Annals of Intensive Care, 12, 114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01091-9
  • Szabo, R. A., Forrest, K., Morley, P., Barwick, S., Bajaj, K., Britt, K., Yong, S. A., Park-Ross, J., Story, D., & Stokes-Parish, J. (2024). CPR training as a gender and rights-based healthcare issue. Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daae156
  • Kim, R. T., Liu, S. C., Schipper, A. E., Sloane, C. S. M., Shimelis, L., Faber, D. A., Zou, R., Wang, E., et al. (2023, October 26). Implementation of a breast adjunct for CPR training manikins increased reported comfort in performing CPR on women. Journal of Emergency Medical Services (JEMS).