Categories
MY TEACHING JOURNEY MY THERAPY JOURNEY

Why do some people write without following the usual conventions of grammar, with abbreviations like ‘yr’ and ‘gr8’, and changing subject midstream without sentences?

There are a few reasons why some people write without following standard grammar conventions, using abbreviations like “yr” or “gr8”, and jumping between topics without clear sentence structure.

  1. Informal Contexts: In casual settings like texting, social media, or online forums, people often prioritise speed and convenience over grammatical accuracy. Abbreviations and shortcuts save time, and there’s less emphasis on formal writing rules.
  2. Texting Culture: Mobile phone texting and early internet communications, such as chat rooms and instant messaging, shaped a style of writing focused on brevity. Character limits in early text messages encouraged abbreviations and shorthand.
  3. Expressiveness: Some people use non-standard writing to reflect personality, tone, or creativity. Abbreviations, emojis, and fragmented thoughts can give the writing a casual, conversational tone, mimicking the way people speak in informal contexts.
  4. Cultural Influence: Certain subcultures, especially younger generations, use shorthand and abbreviations as a form of identity or group belonging. Writing styles that break grammatical conventions can signal membership in these groups.
  5. Attention Span: Some may write in fragmented, stream-of-consciousness styles because it reflects how they think or interact with media. Social media, where short posts are standard, also rewards concise, punchy communication, often at the expense of traditional structure.
  6. Cognitive Differences: For some people, especially those with conditions like ADHD or dyslexia, writing that jumps between subjects or avoids standard grammar might reflect their natural thought patterns. In these cases, non-linear or fragmented writing may be easier or feel more natural.

These deviations often happen in less formal contexts, where clarity and correctness aren’t prioritised. However, in academic, professional, or serious writing, these habits tend to be avoided because they can hinder clear communication.

Categories
Journalling - Reflective Practice My Major Personal Project MY PHOTO JOURNEY MY TEACHING JOURNEY

Surely documentary photography should be objective?

The claim that documentary photography should be objective is a popular myth because it overlooks the inherently subjective nature of photography as a medium. While the genre of documentary photography is often perceived as capturing unbiased, “truthful” depictions of reality, the choices made by photographers—what to photograph, how to frame it, when to click the shutter, and how to present the image—are all subjective decisions that influence how viewers interpret the image.

Firstly, no photograph can capture reality in its entirety. The act of framing a shot inherently excludes other aspects of the scene, guiding viewers towards a particular narrative. Photographers choose what elements to emphasise or exclude, and this choice introduces a perspective. Even in seemingly neutral images, the framing, composition, and moment of capture reflect the photographer’s personal, political, or artistic vision.

Secondly, the editing process further shapes the narrative. Photographers often select certain images over others, adjust lighting or contrast, and arrange photos in a particular order. This process introduces another layer of subjectivity, shaping how an audience perceives the story.

Moreover, the myth of objectivity also assumes that photographs are neutral depictions of reality, ignoring the cultural, social, and political contexts in which images are produced and viewed. Historical and cultural norms influence both the photographer’s gaze and the viewer’s interpretation of images, often in ways that reflect power dynamics, biases, and ideologies.

Finally, it is worth considering the argument of philosopher Susan Sontag, who in On Photography pointed out that photographs are not just passive recordings of the world but are “selections from the world.” This selection process necessarily imposes a subjective framework on the material. The idea of a purely objective documentary photograph, then, is illusory.

So to sum up, documentary photography, while often thought to be objective, is shaped by subjective choices and cultural factors. This myth persists because of the medium’s association with truth and evidence, but the reality is far more complex.