Categories
PURE BLOG

I need help… Which number to call?

I am saddened that even today, many well intentioned safety messages continue to perpetuate the old colonial idea that 999 is THE number to ring in an emergency.

The history of this number dates back to a house fire in London in 1935 and the solution that was put into place by the main telephone engineering provider, Cable & Wireless. They spun it out through their subsidiaries largely in countries where we remained the colonial power (Bahrain, Kenya, and so on).

The rest of the world did not follow suit. In 1976, a part of the European infrastructure (not directly the EU as some right wingers would like us to believe) proposed a pan-European consistent number. They did so because increasingly people were travelling across borders and there were incidents in which people tried calling the wrong number. The number was chosen very carefully to minimise the risk of inadvertent triggering and mischief calls. In 1992, it did become part of EU policy, though by then it had been enabled on all Europe-based networks. It soon spread across much of the rest of the world.

With GSM phones (mobiles to you and I) this number is embedded in the software so that you can pick up any mobile and dial 112 without having to enter a PIN, smile inanely, or wiggle a digit in the direction of its sensitive parts. Despite the best efforts of the Brexiteers, in 2023, 52% of the British population travelled abroad at least once in the year. This number is constantly rising, and especially among the younger generations. Therefore, continuing to promote life saving and water safety messages with a 999 number instead of 112 is not only an aspect of colonialisation but also potentially life threatening today and into the future. We have to stop even suggesting to young people that 999 is an option and embed in their heads that 112 is THE number to ring.

PLEASE let’s eradicate it from safety and related literature NOW!

There are loads of resources out there to understand this better. www.eena.org to start with.

Categories
My Major Personal Project MY PHOTO JOURNEY PURE BLOG Sophistication (Mastery)

The Threat to Press Freedom in the 21st Century

What is Press Freedom?

Press freedom refers to the ability of journalists, media organisations, and individuals to report, investigate, and publish information without undue interference, censorship, or retaliation from the state, corporations, or other powerful entities. It is a fundamental pillar of democracy, ensuring transparency, accountability, and an informed public.

True press freedom includes:

  • Legal protection from state interference or legal threats.
  • Pluralism, ensuring a diversity of media voices.
  • Editorial independence, allowing journalists to report without corporate or political influence.
  • Freedom from violence, meaning journalists can work without fear of intimidation, imprisonment, or assassination.

Why is Press Freedom Important?

A free press holds power to account. It investigates corruption, challenges abuses, and ensures that the public has access to accurate and diverse information. When the press is strong, democracy is strong. Without it, misinformation thrives, power becomes unchecked, and authoritarian tendencies grow.

The decline of press freedom is not just an issue of censorship—it affects human rights, social justice, and the very fabric of democratic governance.

Why is Press Freedom Under Threat?

There are several factors contributing to the erosion of press freedom globally:

  1. Authoritarianism and the Rise of the Far Right
    Far-right movements, often linked to nationalism, populism, and reactionary politics, tend to view the press as an enemy. Figures like Donald Trump in the US, Viktor Orbán in Hungary, and Narendra Modi in India have openly attacked the media, branding journalists as “fake news” peddlers or “enemies of the people.” This delegitimises journalism and justifies restrictions on press freedom.
  2. State Control and Legal Suppression
    Many governments now use legal mechanisms to suppress critical journalism. Laws on national security, defamation, or so-called “fake news” have been weaponised to arrest journalists or shut down independent outlets. For example, Orbán’s Hungary has brought much of the media under state control, while Russia and China imprison dissident journalists.
  3. Corporate Influence and Media Consolidation
    A handful of powerful corporations own vast sections of the global media. Rupert Murdoch’s empire, for instance, has helped shift political discourse to the right in multiple countries. When media ownership is concentrated, editorial independence weakens, and news becomes shaped by corporate and political interests.
  4. Surveillance and Digital Censorship
    Governments are increasingly using digital tools to track, intimidate, and silence journalists. Some regimes exploit spyware (e.g., Pegasus) to monitor dissenters. Social media algorithms, influenced by state pressure or corporate interests, also limit the reach of independent journalism.
  5. Physical Attacks on Journalists
    Violence against journalists is rising. From the murder of Jamal Khashoggi to the repression of investigative journalists in the Philippines and Mexico, those who expose corruption and state abuse are at risk. Impunity for such crimes emboldens further attacks.
  6. Disinformation and the Undermining of Trust
    The spread of disinformation, often amplified by far-right movements, weakens faith in journalism. When people distrust the press, they turn to conspiracy theories, state propaganda, or hyper-partisan sources that confirm their biases. This benefits authoritarian leaders, who thrive on controlling public perception.

The Far-Right and the Attack on Journalism

Far-right movements, in particular, see the press as a threat because it exposes their tactics—racism, xenophobia, corruption, and attacks on democracy. They rely on:

  • Discrediting journalists by calling them biased or untrustworthy.
  • Promoting alternative, hyper-partisan media that reinforce their worldview.
  • Using state power to restrict press freedom, such as closing media outlets or arresting critics.
  • Normalising misinformation so that truth itself becomes contested.

This has dangerous consequences. When the press is weakened, authoritarianism flourishes. When journalists are silenced, corruption grows. When information is controlled, democracy erodes.

The decline of press freedom, then, is a crisis for democracy. The rise of the far-right has played a central role in this trend, using legal, digital, and violent means to control information. Defending press freedom is not just about protecting journalists—it is about preserving truth, accountability, and democratic governance.

If you are interested in supporting press freedom in a number of imaginative ways, then visit https://rsf.org – Reporters Without Borders.